Before We Improve, We Must Heal
Why system transformation in the social sector starts with tending to organizational trauma
SDL is on Summer Rest Break for July! We are soaking up time with our communities and we hope you have a chance to do the same.
TL;DR // We often jump into system redesign without addressing the harm that lives inside our organizations. But when trauma goes unprocessed, it becomes culture and shapes how we relate, decide, and try to change. This post explores the idea of persistent organizational traumatization, drawing on research, Prentis Hemphill’s What It Takes to Heal, and a real-world case from our work in public education. Healing isn’t extra. It’s infrastructure. Before we improve, we have to make space to heal.
In the social sector, we often charge ahead with improvement plans, network designs, and innovation strategies, all while bypassing something foundational: the lived experience of harm within our organizations. What if that very harm — ignored, minimized, institutionalized — is the reason transformation efforts stall? What if the system we’re trying to improve is shaped by persistent traumatization?
Last week, we talked about our belief that, by healing ourselves, we can create space for larger and larger circles of healing. This aligns powerfully with Prentis Hemphill’s framing in What It Takes to Heal, a book our team at SDL deep-dived into this past spring. Hemphill states:
“When we focus on external change without tending to internal transformation, we act out the worst of ourselves in the places where it matters most.” (p. 39)
Hemphill’s work reminds us that the habits, coping mechanisms, and embodied histories of individuals become the soil in which our cultures grow. Without conscious attention to healing, those patterns calcify into organizational norms.
Persistent Traumatization in the Social Sector: A Structural Risk
Pat Vivian and Shana Hormann name what many leaders sense but struggle to articulate: that mission-driven nonprofits, especially those serving communities in crisis, are uniquely susceptible to organizational traumatization.
Organizational trauma is a cumulative, often invisible state where unresolved harm becomes culturally embedded. In their research, Vivian and Hormann outline a clear set of characteristics that distinguish a persistently traumatized organization:
Inadequate emotional containment, where high reactivity and stress are rampant
Ongoing instability marked by constant leadership turnover and precarious funding
Deeply rooted mistrust between staff, leadership, and outsiders
Cycles of hope and discouragement, where new energy quickly fades into a familiar dysfunction
These aren’t abstract issues; they are lived realities that directly impact the ability of people within an organization to collaborate, implement, and sustain change.
When Trauma Becomes Culture: Revisiting a Case
Vivian and Hormann describe how trauma, when left unaddressed, “overpowers the organization’s cultural structure and processes” and creates trauma-genic environments — systems that reproduce harm, even after key players have moved on.
This dynamic is not theoretical. We saw it up close in our work with an urban school district. When we entered the system, the district, along with its state and local partners, was stuck in a cycle of mistrust, fatigue, and fragmentation. As the former superintendent put it:
“Somewhere between July and December, we reached a low point. For SDL to walk into that and keep things peaceful and productive — to move us forward to a place where we could actually celebrate — that was no small feat.”
What we encountered were many of the exact patterns outlined by Vivian and Hormann:
High emotional reactivity and interpersonal tension that had gone unspoken for too long
A sense of precarity: “Will this partnership hold? Can this process be trusted?”
Relational fatigue, especially among those who had weathered multiple leadership transitions and broken efforts at change
We didn’t solve this with a better strategic plan. What enabled forward movement was a commitment to structured emotional containment: holding space, modeling calm, and sustaining facilitation practices that supported reflection and trust-building over time.
As the superintendent reflected:
“You brought enforced patience to the table and helped people see the long game… There’s a stronger sense of safety now — not comfort, but safety — in doing this work.”
That distinction between comfort and safety is critical. Healing doesn’t mean glossing over what’s hard. It means cultivating the conditions where truth can emerge and be held, without collapse, without blame, and without immediate fixes.
This is what it looks like when we stop bypassing harm and start designing with it in view. This district didn’t become “healed,” but it became a space where trust could start to regrow, and from there, authentic improvement became possible.
Healing Is Not a Luxury. It’s a Prerequisite.
Too often, funders and systems leaders see healing as ancillary, something soft or distinctly post-crisis. But evidence suggests otherwise. Healing is infrastructural. It’s what makes strategy possible, collaboration durable, and learning continuous.
Our reading of What It Takes to Heal emphasized what we shared last week, that healing is not a linear achievement, but a repeated practice of awareness, reflection, and action. The same is true at the organizational level. We’ve learned through experience that:
Facilitation without safety leads to more conflict.
Improvement without self-awareness re-inscribes harm.
Collaboration without healing cannot be sustained.
So when we say “before we improve, we must heal,” we’re not calling for a pause in the work. We’re calling for a deeper and more integrated version of it.
Designing for Healing and Improvement Together
As facilitators, our role isn’t just to deliver frameworks or manage timelines. It’s to steward conditions that allow organizations to surface what’s unresolved, name what’s real for the people in them and the communities they serve, and design from a place of integrity. In persistently traumatized systems, that means:
Building emotional containment and trust before introducing change models
Making room for the nonlinear path of healing alongside linear project plans
Recognizing when the system’s reactions are trauma responses and adjusting accordingly
Supporting leaders and staff in understanding and naming their own readiness (or resistance) to transformation
This is slow, patient, and rigorous work. It’s (unfortunately) exceedingly rare. It’s also the only kind of work that we find lasts.
An Invitation
If you’re in a social sector organization, a school district, or a network of changemakers, we invite you to reflect on the following questions. (They’re ones we’re asking ourselves and our partners, too!)
Where has harm lived in our system? How has it shaped us and how we are in relationship?
What would it take to rebuild trust, not just results?
Who do we need to become in order to transform — not just improve — this system?
Let’s not rush past these questions. Let’s bring them into the room. Because the path to transformation isn’t just about what we do next. It’s about turning inward and being willing to work with what we find first.
» In 2023, our team attended a training from Equity Meets Design called Equitably Designed Org Rhythms. We were inspired by an organization that lived so intentionally into their values that it creates humanizing, regenerative work. We now spend half a day per quarter plotting out our own rhythms of reflection, learning strategy, and rest breaks. If you haven’t seen their work, check them out!
» Someone recently asked me, Where are you going to learn more about systems design and find other people who are ‘early adopters’ of practices that can sometimes seem far afield? I didn’t have a good answer, so I’m curious what yours are! Where are you going to find fellow travelers?
» Am I becoming a birder? This emergence practice spoke to me as I slow down to rest my thinking mind and tune into the things I care most about. I love the way that Emergence Magazine transforms some of its most compelling pieces into clear practices we can all apply.
Find us elsewhere: